Gurusamy vs Kaliyammal Advocate - S.Jegdeeswaran — 22/2023
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR070006482023
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
24/2023
Filing Date
10-03-2023
Registration No
22/2023
Registration Date
15-03-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Sattur
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gurusamy
Adv. A. Ganapathiraman
Respondent(s)
Kaliyammal Advocate - S.Jegdeeswaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 11-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 11-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 02-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary I.A.05 of 2024 in O.S.No.22/2023 | District Civil Court, Sattur | 19.08.2025 The interim application filed by the petitioner/defendant (who is the plaintiff in the original suit) seeking to file an additional counter-claim and counter-affidavit under Order 8, Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed. The court found that the counter-claim was filed after the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff was completed (11.12.2023 to 05.01.2024), making it time-barred, and that no justified reasons were provided for the late filing despite citing the Ashokumar Kaira precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary I.A.05 of 2024 in O.S.No.22/2023 | District Civil Court, Sattur | 19.08.2025 The interim application filed by the petitioner/defendant (who is the plaintiff in the original suit) seeking to file an additional counter-claim and counter-affidavit under Order 8, Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed. The court found that the counter-claim was filed after the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff was completed (11.12.2023 to 05.01.2024), making it time-barred, and that no justified reasons were provided for the late filing despite citing the Ashokumar Kaira precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts