SHO KKM PEW CR NO 141 2025 vs SUBRAMANIYAM — 598/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a) 4(1) (C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP360031192025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-10-2025

Filing Number

3118/2025

Filing Date

08-10-2025

Registration No

598/2025

Registration Date

08-10-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

141

Police Station

P.E. Wing Kottakuppam

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a) 4(1) (C)
Mp/1/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SHO KKM PEW CR NO 141 2025
Mp/2/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SHO KKM PEW CR NO 141 2025

Petitioner(s)

SHO (Station House Officer) KKM PEW CR NO 141 2025

Adv. Sun Inspector of Police

Respondent(s)

SUBRAMANIYAM

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur

30-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Evidence

24-03-2026

Evidence

18-03-2026

Trial

17-03-2026

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 598/2025 The court discharged the respondent Subramaniyam, finding insufficient evidence to establish charges under Sections 4(1)(a) and 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024. Though police recovered 24 bottles of Corona Beer from the accused on 23-04-2025 during a vehicle check, the court determined that critical procedural gaps—including the absence of independent witness statements, contradictions in police testimony, and lack of proper documentary evidence—created reasonable doubt about the accused's culpability. The court noted the investigating officer failed to corroborate key facts and rejected the case on grounds of insufficient credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 598/2025 The court discharged the respondent Subramaniyam, finding insufficient evidence to establish charges under Sections 4(1)(a) and 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024. Though police recovered 24 bottles of Corona Beer from the accused on 23-04-2025 during a vehicle check, the court determined that critical procedural gaps—including the absence of independent witness statements, contradictions in police testimony, and lack of proper documentary evidence—created reasonable doubt about the accused's culpability. The court noted the investigating officer failed to corroborate key facts and rejected the case on grounds of insufficient credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case