SHO KKM PEW CR NO 83 2025 vs DINESH — 605/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a) 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 15th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP360031112025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-10-2025

Filing Number

3110/2025

Filing Date

08-10-2025

Registration No

605/2025

Registration Date

08-10-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

83

Police Station

P.E. Wing Kottakuppam

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a) 4(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

SHO (Station House Officer) KKM PEW CR NO 83 2025

Adv. Sun Inspector of Police

Respondent(s)

DINESH

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur

15-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Evidence

02-04-2026

Evidence

26-03-2026

Evidence

24-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court dismissed charges against accused Dinesh under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024, finding insufficient evidence to establish he was the offender. Key witnesses contradicted the prosecution's case regarding the seizure of beer bottles on 24-03-2025, with the court noting lack of credible corroboration and procedural inconsistencies. The accused was acquitted under BNSS Section 271(1), with the court determining the case lacked the necessary evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

02-04-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed charges against accused Dinesh under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024, finding insufficient evidence to establish he was the offender. Key witnesses contradicted the prosecution's case regarding the seizure of beer bottles on 24-03-2025, with the court noting lack of credible corroboration and procedural inconsistencies. The accused was acquitted under BNSS Section 271(1), with the court determining the case lacked the necessary evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case