Vasantha vs SHO Avalurpettai PS — 952/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,194(3) of BNSS. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP010013712026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

1141/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

952/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,194(3) of BNSS
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section Sec 108 of BNS @ Sec 80 of BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vasantha

    Adv. Senthilkumar P R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Avalurpettai PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    BailView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vasantha (mother-in-law of the deceased) under Section 482 B.N.S.S. The court found that although the investigation was completed and final report filed, the seriousness of the charges under Section 80 B.N.S. (abetment of suicide through torture and demand for money/jewels) warranted denial of anticipatory bail, despite the co-accused husband having previously obtained bail from the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 952/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vasantha (mother-in-law of the deceased) under Section 482 B.N.S.S. The court found that although the investigation was completed and final report filed, the seriousness of the charges under Section 80 B.N.S. (abetment of suicide through torture and demand for money/jewels) warranted denial of anticipatory bail, despite the co-accused husband having previously obtained bail from the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case