Vinayagam alias Vinayagamoorthy vs SHO Vellimedupettai PS — 949/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP010013642026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

1134/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

949/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinayagam alias Vinayagamoorthy

    Adv. Thamizharasan V

  2. 2.Anand alias Anandhan

    Adv. Thamizharasan V

  3. 3.Ramkumar

    Adv. Thamizharasan V

  4. 4.Sakthivel alias Arunkumar

    Adv. Thamizharasan V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Vellimedupettai PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    BailView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Vinayagam, Anand, Ramkumar, and Sakthivel) in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court allowed the petition as anticipatory bail had already been granted in two prior applications, but this petition was filed to correct jurisdictional errors in the previous orders. The accused must execute a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount and surrender within two weeks, with all other conditions from the earlier bail orders remaining unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 949/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Vinayagam, Anand, Ramkumar, and Sakthivel) in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court allowed the petition as anticipatory bail had already been granted in two prior applications, but this petition was filed to correct jurisdictional errors in the previous orders. The accused must execute a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount and surrender within two weeks, with all other conditions from the earlier bail orders remaining unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case