RAJARATHINAM B vs SELVAM S Advocate - BOOPATHI K M — 25/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(C). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL100000042021
Filing Number
7/2021
Filing Date
06-01-2021
Registration No
25/2021
Registration Date
08-02-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJARATHINAM B
Adv. ARUMUGAM J
Respondent(s)
SELVAM S Advocate - BOOPATHI K M
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 02-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 19-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Court of Gudiyattam dismissed B. Rajarathinam's suit for mandatory injunction and vacant possession against S. Selvam without cost. The court found that the plaintiff failed to pray for a declaration of title despite the defendant clearly denying his ownership claim through registered sale deeds, and the plaintiff himself admitted during cross-examination that the defendant possessed the disputed property (66 sq.ft) even before his purchase in January 2020. Since title was seriously disputed, a declaration was mandatory before seeking injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Court of Gudiyattam dismissed B. Rajarathinam's suit for mandatory injunction and vacant possession against S. Selvam without cost. The court found that the plaintiff failed to pray for a declaration of title despite the defendant clearly denying his ownership claim through registered sale deeds, and the plaintiff himself admitted during cross-examination that the defendant possessed the disputed property (66 sq.ft) even before his purchase in January 2020. Since title was seriously disputed, a declaration was mandatory before seeking injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts