Sakthivel A(SOLE) vs VELLORE TALUK PS Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M — 952/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVL010013922026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
1089/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
952/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Vellore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Vellore
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
26
Police Station
KANIYAMBADI POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sakthivel A(SOLE)
Adv. Mahendravarman Jayachandran
Respondent(s)
VELLORE TALUK PS (Police Station) Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Vellore
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 952 of 2026 The Principal Sessions Judge of Vellore dismissed Sakthivel's second anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 of BNSS 2023 for alleged offences under Sections 296(b) and 118(1) of BNS 2023. The court rejected the petition because the petitioner's earlier anticipatory bail application before the Madras High Court had been dismissed on merits, a subsequent application before this court had also been dismissed, the petitioner was involved in three similar offences under investigation at various police stations, and a verbal quarrel had escalated into assault according to the FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 952 of 2026 The Principal Sessions Judge of Vellore dismissed Sakthivel's second anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 of BNSS 2023 for alleged offences under Sections 296(b) and 118(1) of BNS 2023. The court rejected the petition because the petitioner's earlier anticipatory bail application before the Madras High Court had been dismissed on merits, a subsequent application before this court had also been dismissed, the petitioner was involved in three similar offences under investigation at various police stations, and a verbal quarrel had escalated into assault according to the FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts