A4. Deiveegan G vs GUDIYATHAM TOWN PS Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M — 953/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVL010013902026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

1087/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

953/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Vellore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Vellore

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

82

Police Station

GUDIYATHAM TOWN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A4. Deiveegan G

    Adv. P MOHANAVELU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GUDIYATHAM TOWN PS (Police Station) Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P.No.953 of 2026 The Vellore Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Deiveegan (A4) in a case involving alleged assault during a temple festival dispute. The court found that the injured party was discharged from hospital, the petitioner had no prior criminal record, and investigation was ongoing. Bail was granted on condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearances, cooperation with police interrogation, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Vellore

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 953/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P.No.953 of 2026 The Vellore Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Deiveegan (A4) in a case involving alleged assault during a temple festival dispute. The court found that the injured party was discharged from hospital, the petitioner had no prior criminal record, and investigation was ongoing. Bail was granted on condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearances, cooperation with police interrogation, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case