STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs HARIHARAN — 10/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTV150012982025
e-Filing Number
02-10-2025
Filing Number
1198/2025
Filing Date
05-11-2025
Registration No
10/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kodavasal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
8
Police Station
ERAVANCHERY P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. Selvam U
Respondent(s)
HARIHARAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 21-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Munsiff Court in Kodavasal, Tamil Nadu acquitted M. Hariharan of charges under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court determined that the police failed to follow mandatory procedures under Section 32(c) of the TNP Act—specifically, the seized liquor bottles were destroyed without proper authorization or supervision by a senior police officer, no samples were retained for chemical analysis, and no independent witnesses corroborated the seizure, creating irreconcilable gaps in the evidence that warranted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District Munsiff Court in Kodavasal, Tamil Nadu acquitted M. Hariharan of charges under Section 4(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court determined that the police failed to follow mandatory procedures under Section 32(c) of the TNP Act—specifically, the seized liquor bottles were destroyed without proper authorization or supervision by a senior police officer, no samples were retained for chemical analysis, and no independent witnesses corroborated the seizure, creating irreconcilable gaps in the evidence that warranted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts