EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK ITS REP AUTHOURISED T SURENDHIRAN vs PERHAPERUMAL R — 154/2026

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 13th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTV020006112026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

08-02-2026

Filing Number

589/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

154/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Acts & Sections

SecuritisationandReconstructionofFinancialAssets&EnforcementofSecurityInterestAct Section 14

Petitioner(s)

EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK ITS REP AUTHOURISED T SURENDHIRAN

Adv. SATHIYARAJ M

Respondent(s)

PERHAPERUMAL R

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

13-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Orders

24-02-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: Equitas Small Finance Bank v. Pethaperumal Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tiruvarur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the respondents' mortgaged property. The court found that the respondents defaulted on a home equity loan of Rs. 3,10,000 with outstanding dues of Rs. 3,77,879 as of January 2026, and the bank had complied with statutory notice requirements under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. The Advocate Commissioner was authorized to take possession with police assistance within 60 days, with a fee of Rs. 30,000 payable by the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Equitas Small Finance Bank v. Pethaperumal Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tiruvarur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the respondents' mortgaged property. The court found that the respondents defaulted on a home equity loan of Rs. 3,10,000 with outstanding dues of Rs. 3,77,879 as of January 2026, and the bank had complied with statutory notice requirements under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. The Advocate Commissioner was authorized to take possession with police assistance within 60 days, with a fee of Rs. 30,000 payable by the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case