EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK ITS REP AUTHOURISED T SURENDHIRAN vs PERHAPERUMAL R — 154/2026
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTV020006112026
e-Filing Number
08-02-2026
Filing Number
589/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
154/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK ITS REP AUTHOURISED T SURENDHIRAN
Adv. SATHIYARAJ M
Respondent(s)
-
1.PERHAPERUMAL R
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Equitas Small Finance Bank v. Pethaperumal Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tiruvarur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the respondents' mortgaged property. The court found that the respondents defaulted on a home equity loan of Rs. 3,10,000 with outstanding dues of Rs. 3,77,879 as of January 2026, and the bank had complied with statutory notice requirements under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. The Advocate Commissioner was authorized to take possession with police assistance within 60 days, with a fee of Rs. 30,000 payable by the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 154/2026
Case Summary: Equitas Small Finance Bank v. Pethaperumal Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tiruvarur allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's petition under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the respondents' mortgaged property. The court found that the respondents defaulted on a home equity loan of Rs. 3,10,000 with outstanding dues of Rs. 3,77,879 as of January 2026, and the bank had complied with statutory notice requirements under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. The Advocate Commissioner was authorized to take possession with police assistance within 60 days, with a fee of Rs. 30,000 payable by the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts