RAVINSANKAR vs PANDIYARAJAN — 15/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7,Rule1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV010007542024
Filing Number
186/2024
Filing Date
15-04-2024
Registration No
15/2024
Registration Date
15-04-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVINSANKAR
Adv. THIRU. S.R. AYYAPPAN
Respondent(s)
PANDIYARAJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 13-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 24-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 02-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Ravishankar v. Pandiyarajan (O.S. No. 15/2024) The Principal District Judge, Tiruvarur, decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Ravishankar, holding that the promissory note dated 30.05.2023 for Rs.10,00,000/- is true, valid, and enforceable. The defendant's claims that previous loans of Rs.35,00,000/- (2017 and 2019) had been repaid and that blank documents were misused were rejected as after-thought defences lacking supporting evidence. The court awarded the plaintiff Rs.11,05,534/- (principal plus interest) plus 6% interest on Rs.10,00,000/- from the date of suit filing until realization, with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ravishankar v. Pandiyarajan (O.S. No. 15/2024) The Principal District Judge, Tiruvarur, decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Ravishankar, holding that the promissory note dated 30.05.2023 for Rs.10,00,000/- is true, valid, and enforceable. The defendant's claims that previous loans of Rs.35,00,000/- (2017 and 2019) had been repaid and that blank documents were misused were rejected as after-thought defences lacking supporting evidence. The court awarded the plaintiff Rs.11,05,534/- (principal plus interest) plus 6% interest on Rs.10,00,000/- from the date of suit filing until realization, with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts