SI OF POLICE GRP JOLARPET vs ALAMELU R — 149/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 120(B),379 IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTU020023482019

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2345/2019

Filing Date

19-03-2019

Registration No

149/2019

Registration Date

20-03-2019

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

JOLARPET POLICE STATION

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 120(B),379 IPC
MP/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section ALAMELU RSI OF POLICE GRP JOLARPET
MP/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section ALAMELU RSI OF POLICE GRP JOLARPET
MP/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section SI OF POLICE GRP JOLARPET
MP/6/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC

Petitioner(s)

SI OF POLICE GRP JOLARPET

Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

ALAMELU R

PAKALAMMAL

RAJANDRAN

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur

25-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Arguments

13-03-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate III court acquitted accused A1 (Alamelu) and A3 (Rajendran) of theft and criminal conspiracy charges under IPC sections 379 r/w 120-B, finding the prosecution failed to prove their involvement beyond reasonable doubt despite circumstantial evidence. However, accused A2 (Pagalammal) was proven guilty based on confessional statements and recovered melted gold, but her charges abated due to her death during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate III court acquitted accused A1 (Alamelu) and A3 (Rajendran) of theft and criminal conspiracy charges under IPC sections 379 r/w 120-B, finding the prosecution failed to prove their involvement beyond reasonable doubt despite circumstantial evidence. However, accused A2 (Pagalammal) was proven guilty based on confessional statements and recovered melted gold, but her charges abated due to her death during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case