Venkatesan vs SI of Police Kandili PS — 853/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTU020017102026

Filing Number

1708/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

853/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

KANDILI POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Venkatesan

    Adv. ARIVUSUDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SI of Police Kandili PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court granted bail to Vengatesan, accused of offences under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3), considering that he had already served 28 days of judicial custody and most of the investigation was complete. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, cooperation with interrogation, and prohibitions against witness tampering or similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Await Reports

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 853/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court granted bail to Vengatesan, accused of offences under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3), considering that he had already served 28 days of judicial custody and most of the investigation was complete. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, cooperation with interrogation, and prohibitions against witness tampering or similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case