GURUSAMY vs ANTONYRAJ Advocate - EXPARTE — 11/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R11(2). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNTS080001462020
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
198/2020
Filing Date
12-08-2020
Registration No
11/2020
Registration Date
28-08-2020
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GURUSAMY
Adv. ANANTH M
Eshwari
Adv. ANANTH M
Karuppayi
Adv. ANANTH M
Sakkammal
Adv. ANANTH M
Veyilykandhammal
Adv. ANANTH M
Respondent(s)
ANTONYRAJ Advocate - EXPARTE
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 23-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 11-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this property dispute (EA.No.2/2023 in EP.11/2020 in R.C.O.P.4/2007) heard on 11.03.2026 by the Principal District Civil Court, Sankarankoil, the court found that the appellant's claim to the property was invalid. The court determined that the property in question (old door no. 52, new door no. 61) was legitimately transferred through proper deed of gift dated 20.01.2001 to Subbulakshmi, who later transferred it to the respondent (Balamurugan) through a deed dated 29.06.2016, and the respondent currently leases it to Rathnam. The cross-examination of the appellant's witness was concluded, with the court holding that the appellant has no rights over the property and dismissing the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this property dispute (EA.No.2/2023 in EP.11/2020 in R.C.O.P.4/2007) heard on 11.03.2026 by the Principal District Civil Court, Sankarankoil, the court found that the appellant's claim to the property was invalid. The court determined that the property in question (old door no. 52, new door no. 61) was legitimately transferred through proper deed of gift dated 20.01.2001 to Subbulakshmi, who later transferred it to the respondent (Balamurugan) through a deed dated 29.06.2016, and the respondent currently leases it to Rathnam. The cross-examination of the appellant's witness was concluded, with the court holding that the appellant has no rights over the property and dismissing the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts