Anthony ponraj vs Gananmutu and one another — 200110/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTS040003992021

Filing Number

200110/2021

Filing Date

24-Jun-2021

Registration No

200110/2021

Registration Date

24-Jun-2021

Court

Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi

Judge

5-Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anthony ponraj

    Adv. Tr.K.P.Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gananmutu and one another

  2. 2.Branch Manager

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Anthony Ponraj v. Gananmutu and United India Insurance Co. Ltd (Case 200110/2021) The court dismissed the petitioner's claim for ₹15,00,000 in compensation under Motor Vehicles Act Sections 140 and 163(A). The petitioner sought damages after a two-wheeler accident on 07.03.2018 allegedly caused by an unknown vehicle that hit-and-run. The court determined this constitutes a "Hit and Run" case, establishing that victims in such cases can only claim compensation through Section 140 (requiring application to the district collector) rather than before the tribunal. The court found insufficient evidence to identify the offending vehicle and held the petitioner had no enforceable claim against the named respondents in this tribunal proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  10. 16-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  11. 24-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  12. 04-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  13. 13-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  14. 17-Jul-2025

    Await Reports

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  15. 27-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  16. 11-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  17. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  18. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  20. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  21. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  22. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  23. 24-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  24. 01-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  25. 18-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  26. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  27. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  28. 03-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  29. 12-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  30. 10-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  31. 06-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  32. 31-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  33. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  34. 05-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  35. 07-Nov-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  36. 07-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  37. 18-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  38. 12-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  39. 01-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  40. 04-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  41. 10-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  42. 06-Jun-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  43. 06-Jun-2023

    Lok Adalat

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  44. 28-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  45. 28-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  46. 11-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  47. 23-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  48. 06-Dec-2022

    Await Reports

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  49. 19-Oct-2022

    Await Reports

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  50. 27-Sep-2022

    Await Reports

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  51. 14-Sep-2022

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  52. 14-Sep-2022

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  53. 13-Aug-2022

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  54. 14-Jul-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  55. 26-Jun-2022

    Enquiry

    Additional Sub-ordinate Judge

  56. 02-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 24-Jun-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200110/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Anthony Ponraj v. Gananmutu and United India Insurance Co. Ltd (Case 200110/2021) The court dismissed the petitioner's claim for ₹15,00,000 in compensation under Motor Vehicles Act Sections 140 and 163(A). The petitioner sought damages after a two-wheeler accident on 07.03.2018 allegedly caused by an unknown vehicle that hit-and-run. The court determined this constitutes a "Hit and Run" case, establishing that victims in such cases can only claim compensation through Section 140 (requiring application to the district collector) rather than before the tribunal. The court found insufficient evidence to identify the offending vehicle and held the petitioner had no enforceable claim against the named respondents in this tribunal proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case