S. Selvaganapathy vs Special District Revenue Officer (LA), Tiruchirappalli-20 Advocate - G.GIRIJA — 128/2025
Case under Landacquisitionact Section 26,29. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 27th April 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTS010056682025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1214/2025
Filing Date
16-07-2021
Registration No
128/2025
Registration Date
16-07-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Tenkasi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Selvaganapathy
Adv. xx
Respondent(s)
Special District Revenue Officer (LA), Tiruchirappalli-20 Advocate - G.GIRIJA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness affidavit statement in Land Acquisition Case No. 128/2025 before the District and Sessions Court, Tenkasi, dated December 2, 2025. The witness, a former village administrative officer, testified regarding the land valuation and survey of agricultural plots (Nos. 893/1, 895/1, and 896/1) in Mahanathalingam village, with valuations determined by the District Revenue Officer's orders of October 17, 2017, and finalized on December 7, 2017. The witness acknowledged limitations in his direct knowledge of the case details and the methodology used to determine the "Near Vicinity Area" for property valuation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness affidavit statement in Land Acquisition Case No. 128/2025 before the District and Sessions Court, Tenkasi, dated December 2, 2025. The witness, a former village administrative officer, testified regarding the land valuation and survey of agricultural plots (Nos. 893/1, 895/1, and 896/1) in Mahanathalingam village, with valuations determined by the District Revenue Officer's orders of October 17, 2017, and finalized on December 7, 2017. The witness acknowledged limitations in his direct knowledge of the case details and the methodology used to determine the "Near Vicinity Area" for property valuation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts