K R Ravichandiran vs A kumar — 23/2024
Case under The Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 Section 21(2)(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
RLTOP - Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Original Petition
CNR: TNTR220004722024
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
e-Filing Number
25-11-2024
Filing Number
641/2024
Filing Date
10-12-2024
Registration No
23/2024
Registration Date
10-12-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Ambattur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K R Ravichandiran
Adv. B LOGENDIRAN
Respondent(s)
A kumar
K Kanchana
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Counter
Counter
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Counter |
| 12-12-2025 | Counter |
| 14-11-2025 | Counter |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a civil case (RLTOP: 23/2024) filed in the Ambattur Taluk Court under Section 10 of the Registration Act, 1873, heard on March 6, 2026. The petitioner disputes a property/lease transaction with the respondent involving Rs. 30 lakhs received as security deposit and claims regarding partnership and financial arrangements with Vijayapurnava Stampings company. The court completed cross-examination of the petitioner and found his testimony unreliable on multiple material points, including contradictions regarding the nature of the transaction, receipt of funds, and alleged police involvement. The petition is dismissed (rejected) as the petitioner failed to prove his claims with credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a civil case (RLTOP: 23/2024) filed in the Ambattur Taluk Court under Section 10 of the Registration Act, 1873, heard on March 6, 2026. The petitioner disputes a property/lease transaction with the respondent involving Rs. 30 lakhs received as security deposit and claims regarding partnership and financial arrangements with Vijayapurnava Stampings company. The court completed cross-examination of the petitioner and found his testimony unreliable on multiple material points, including contradictions regarding the nature of the transaction, receipt of funds, and alleged police involvement. The petition is dismissed (rejected) as the petitioner failed to prove his claims with credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts