P. Ramamurthy vs madavaiah Advocate - V.S.Velayudham — 60/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 01-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTR210000702021

Filing Number

109/2021

Filing Date

03-Sep-2021

Registration No

60/2021

Registration Date

03-Sep-2021

Court

District Munsif Court, Tiruttani

Judge

2-District Munsif

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Ramamurthy

    Adv. C.A. Natarajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.madavaiah Advocate - V.S.Velayudham

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 60/2021 District Munsif Court, Tirutani | Date: March 4, 2026 In this property dispute, petitioner P. Ramamurthy (age 66, farmer) sought a right of way over Schedule B property claimed by respondent V.S. Velayudham. Ramamurthy testified that he has used a 5-foot pathway along Schedule A property for 25-30 years to access his land, and claims entitlement to a right of way through Schedule B property. The respondent's revenue documents show the Schedule B property in the respondent's name. The court recorded Ramamurthy's testimony regarding boundary disputes, construction of boundary walls, and his historical use of the pathway. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination of the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  13. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  14. 19-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  15. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  16. 02-Jan-2026

    List / Special List

    District Munsif

  17. 13-Dec-2025

    List / Special List

    District Munsif

  18. 12-Dec-2025

    List / Special List

    District Munsif

  19. 03-Nov-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  20. 03-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  21. 24-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  22. 13-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  23. 08-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  24. 08-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  25. 18-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  26. 18-Jul-2025

    Restored

    District Munsif

  27. 18-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  28. 11-Jul-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  29. 11-Jul-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  30. 11-Jul-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  31. 11-Jul-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  32. 11-Jul-2025

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

  33. 11-Jul-2025

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

  34. 26-Apr-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  35. 26-Apr-2024

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

  36. 26-Apr-2024

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  37. 05-Apr-2024

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  38. 22-Mar-2024

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  39. 02-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  40. 21-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  41. 02-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  42. 19-Jan-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  43. 19-Jan-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  44. 05-Jan-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  45. 05-Jan-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  46. 11-Dec-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  47. 14-Nov-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  48. 11-Oct-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  49. 19-Sep-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  50. 24-Aug-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  51. 27-Jul-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  52. 05-Jul-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  53. 14-Jun-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  54. 27-Apr-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  55. 23-Mar-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  56. 18-Feb-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  57. 19-Jan-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  58. 09-Dec-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  59. 18-Nov-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  60. 28-Oct-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  61. 19-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  62. 26-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  63. 12-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  64. 06-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  65. 01-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  66. 24-Mar-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  67. 03-Mar-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  68. 25-Jan-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  69. 15-Dec-2021

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  70. 20-Nov-2021

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  71. 29-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  72. 01-Oct-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  73. 03-Sep-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  74. 03-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 60/2021 District Munsif Court, Tirutani | Date: March 4, 2026 In this property dispute, petitioner P. Ramamurthy (age 66, farmer) sought a right of way over Schedule B property claimed by respondent V.S. Velayudham. Ramamurthy testified that he has used a 5-foot pathway along Schedule A property for 25-30 years to access his land, and claims entitlement to a right of way through Schedule B property. The respondent's revenue documents show the Schedule B property in the respondent's name. The court recorded Ramamurthy's testimony regarding boundary disputes, construction of boundary walls, and his historical use of the pathway. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination of the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case