K. Anusuya vs G. Narayanan Advocate - V. Venkatesan — 32/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a),27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR210000342023
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
47/2023
Filing Date
21-07-2023
Registration No
32/2023
Registration Date
21-07-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K. Anusuya
Adv. C.A. Natarajan
V. Shyamala
Adv. C.A. Natarajan
R. Parimala
Adv. C.A. Natarajan
V. Jagadish
Adv. C.A. Natarajan
Respondent(s)
G. Narayanan Advocate - V. Venkatesan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a court order from the District Court (Tirutani) in Tamil Nadu dated March 6, 2026, documenting cross-examination testimony in a land dispute case (Case No. 32/2023). The plaintiff's second witness testified regarding conflicting claims about property ownership, survey maps, and field numbers, with disputes over previous court orders from 1967. The witness largely denied or contradicted allegations made against him regarding false testimony, property boundaries, and communications with advocates. The order records the witness's statements but does not indicate a final judgment or case outcome at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a court order from the District Court (Tirutani) in Tamil Nadu dated March 6, 2026, documenting cross-examination testimony in a land dispute case (Case No. 32/2023). The plaintiff's second witness testified regarding conflicting claims about property ownership, survey maps, and field numbers, with disputes over previous court orders from 1967. The witness largely denied or contradicted allegations made against him regarding false testimony, property boundaries, and communications with advocates. The order records the witness's statements but does not indicate a final judgment or case outcome at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts