G. MAHESH KUMAR vs E. VIJAYARAGAVALU Advocate - V. Venkatesan — 10/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTR210000102017
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
10/2017
Filing Date
31-01-2017
Registration No
10/2017
Registration Date
31-01-2017
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G. MAHESH KUMAR
Adv. Neeraj
Respondent(s)
E. VIJAYARAGAVALU Advocate - V. Venkatesan
E. Vanitha
Adv. V. Venkatesan
C. Sulochana (Died)
Krishnaveni (Died)
Niksonmeupomnevpikin
Adv. V. Venkatesan
Kuberan (Died)
C. Ganesan
C. Harikrishnan (Died)
C. Velan
C. Jothiswari
C. Hemavathi
C. Chinnapaiyan
C. Dinesh
Lakshmi
Kokila
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
IA Pending
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 27-01-2026 | Await Reports |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to document the physical features of the suit property and file a report and plan has been dismissed. The petitioners are directed to pay the costs of the petition to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to document the physical features of the suit property and file a report and plan has been dismissed. The petitioners are directed to pay the costs of the petition to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts