Elumalai vs Krishnan Advocate - K.G. Nagabooshanam — 3/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 27(C). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR210000032021
Filing Number
5/2021
Filing Date
21-01-2021
Registration No
3/2021
Registration Date
21-01-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Elumalai
Adv. C.A. Natarajan
Respondent(s)
Krishnan Advocate - K.G. Nagabooshanam
The Revenue Divisional officer, Tiruttani
The District Collector , Tiruvallur
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Elumalai v. P.S. Krishnan (OS No. 3/2021) The District Munsif of Tiruttani granted permanent injunction in favor of Elumalai, restraining the first defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property. The court found that the 1st defendant validly executed a registered settlement deed in October 2019 gifting the property to Elumalai out of love and affection, and the plaintiff established lawful possession through patta changes, tax receipts, and actual construction and agricultural use. The defendant's claims that the deed was executed under compulsion or was joint family property were rejected, particularly after the defendant's own son and daughter admitted the plaintiff's possession and the validity of the settlement deed during testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Elumalai v. P.S. Krishnan (OS No. 3/2021) The District Munsif of Tiruttani granted permanent injunction in favor of Elumalai, restraining the first defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property. The court found that the 1st defendant validly executed a registered settlement deed in October 2019 gifting the property to Elumalai out of love and affection, and the plaintiff established lawful possession through patta changes, tax receipts, and actual construction and agricultural use. The defendant's claims that the deed was executed under compulsion or was joint family property were rejected, particularly after the defendant's own son and daughter admitted the plaintiff's possession and the validity of the settlement deed during testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts