G. Meenakshi vs P. Gurumurthy and 10 others — 51/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/sVIIR1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 30th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTR080001572020
Filing Number
116/2020
Filing Date
09-Mar-2020
Registration No
51/2020
Registration Date
09-Mar-2020
Court
II. Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee
Judge
1-Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G. Meenakshi
Adv. T. Mala
Respondent(s)
-
1.P. Gurumurthy and 10 others
-
2.Iyyappan
-
3.Srinivasan
-
4.Sabari
-
5.Vanaja
-
6.Suriya Kala
-
7.P. Kumaraguru
-
8.Hariharan
-
9.Vasudevan
-
10.I. Sarawathi
-
11.The Sub Registrar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Copy of Judgment
-
30-Apr-2026
Copy of Decree
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
22-Apr-2026
Await Reports
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
16-Apr-2026
Await Reports
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
02-Apr-2026
Await Reports
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
12-Mar-2026
Additional Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
05-Mar-2026
Additional Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
05-Feb-2026
Amendment
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
08-Jan-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court allowed G. Meenakshi's petition to amend the original case pleadings concerning an unequal partition deed executed on 23.02.2017. Meenakshi claimed she received only 1/6 share (2,716 sq ft) instead of an equal 1/11 share of inherited ancestral property as a legal heir, allegedly due to unequal allocation in the partition document. The court permitted the amendments to pursue her equitable share claim in the underlying suit, rejecting respondents' contentions that the partition deed could not be challenged and that the limitation period had expired, finding that resolution of substantive issues should occur in the main case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jan-2026
Amendment
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
17-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
03-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
19-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
06-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
16-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
08-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
15-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
04-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
24-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
07-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
03-Jun-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
26-Mar-2025
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
13-Feb-2025
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
06-Dec-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
08-Nov-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
03-Oct-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
01-Jul-2024
Trial
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
11-Jun-2024
Issues
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
09-Mar-2024
Lok Adalat
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
16-Feb-2024
Lok Adalat
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
15-Dec-2023
Issues
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
03-Nov-2023
Issues
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
26-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
17-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
07-Jul-2023
Steps
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
03-Jun-2023
Steps
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
14-Mar-2023
Steps
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
01-Feb-2023
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
05-Jan-2023
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
02-Dec-2022
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
18-Oct-2022
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
26-Sep-2022
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
05-Sep-2022
IA Pending
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
29-Jul-2022
Issues
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
21-Jun-2022
Issues
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
29-Mar-2022
Issues
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
22-Jan-2022
Issues
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
16-Dec-2021
Issues
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
15-Nov-2021
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
06-Oct-2021
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
29-Sep-2021
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
23-Jul-2021
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
10-Jun-2021
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
17-Apr-2021
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
06-Mar-2021
Written Statement
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
28-Jan-2021
Issue of Service
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
23-Dec-2020
Issue of Service
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
22-Dec-2020
Issue of Service
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
11-Nov-2020
Issue of Service
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
05-Oct-2020
Issue of Service
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
01-Sep-2020
Issue of Service
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
31-Jul-2020
Issue of Service
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
01-Jul-2020
Issue of Service
Additional District and Sessions Judge - II
-
01-Jun-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 51/2020
The court allowed G. Meenakshi's petition to amend the original case pleadings concerning an unequal partition deed executed on 23.02.2017. Meenakshi claimed she received only 1/6 share (2,716 sq ft) instead of an equal 1/11 share of inherited ancestral property as a legal heir, allegedly due to unequal allocation in the partition document. The court permitted the amendments to pursue her equitable share claim in the underlying suit, rejecting respondents' contentions that the partition deed could not be challenged and that the limitation period had expired, finding that resolution of substantive issues should occur in the main case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts