M.Josephine Sagaya Rani vs Nil — 349/2025
Case under Indiandivorceact Section 10(A). Disposed: Contested--Mutual Consent on 26th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTR010076432025
Filing Number
3178/2025
Filing Date
08-09-2025
Registration No
349/2025
Registration Date
09-09-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Mutual Consent
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Josephine Sagaya Rani
Adv. D. palani
Annadurai Joseph Sandanam
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 09-09-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 349/2025 The Principal District Judge at Tiruvallur granted a mutual consent divorce petition filed by M. Josephine Sagaya Rani and Annadurai Joseph Sandanam under Section 10(A) of the Indian Divorce Act. The couple, married on 27.08.1992 according to Christian rites, had been living separately since 2013 due to misunderstandings and irreconcilable differences. The court found that the matrimonial bond was irretrievably broken, the mandatory 6-month waiting period had elapsed, and no reconciliation was possible despite family efforts. The petitioners' testimony and documentary evidence (marriage certificate, photographs, and identity documents) substantiated the marriage and their mutual consent to dissolution. The court dissolved the marriage on 26.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 349/2025 The Principal District Judge at Tiruvallur granted a mutual consent divorce petition filed by M. Josephine Sagaya Rani and Annadurai Joseph Sandanam under Section 10(A) of the Indian Divorce Act. The couple, married on 27.08.1992 according to Christian rites, had been living separately since 2013 due to misunderstandings and irreconcilable differences. The court found that the matrimonial bond was irretrievably broken, the mandatory 6-month waiting period had elapsed, and no reconciliation was possible despite family efforts. The petitioners' testimony and documentary evidence (marriage certificate, photographs, and identity documents) substantiated the marriage and their mutual consent to dissolution. The court dissolved the marriage on 26.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts