Mekala Anji vs The Inspector of police, Madhavaram ps, Cr. No. 80/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 992/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010020282026
Filing Number
1269/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
992/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
80
Police Station
Madhavaram Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mekala Anji
Adv. D.lemuvel
-
2.Jegan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of police, Madhavaram ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 80/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No. 992/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition filed by Mekala Anji and Jegan, who were arrested on 06.02.2026 for allegedly committing theft of an Oppo cellphone from a bus passenger on 05.02.2026 under Section 304 of BNS. The court denied bail citing the grave nature of the offense, pending investigation, the petitioners' previous criminal records, risk of absconding, and property value involved, despite the accused claiming innocence and offering to cooperate with police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 992/2026
Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No. 992/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition filed by Mekala Anji and Jegan, who were arrested on 06.02.2026 for allegedly committing theft of an Oppo cellphone from a bus passenger on 05.02.2026 under Section 304 of BNS. The court denied bail citing the grave nature of the offense, pending investigation, the petitioners' previous criminal records, risk of absconding, and property value involved, despite the accused claiming innocence and offering to cooperate with police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts