Mekala Anji vs The Inspector of police, Madhavaram ps, Cr. No. 80/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 992/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010020282026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1269/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

992/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

80

Police Station

Madhavaram Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304

Petitioner(s)

Mekala Anji

Adv. D.lemuvel

Jegan

Respondent(s)

The Inspector of police, Madhavaram ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 80/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Issue of Service

12-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No. 992/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition filed by Mekala Anji and Jegan, who were arrested on 06.02.2026 for allegedly committing theft of an Oppo cellphone from a bus passenger on 05.02.2026 under Section 304 of BNS. The court denied bail citing the grave nature of the offense, pending investigation, the petitioners' previous criminal records, risk of absconding, and property value involved, despite the accused claiming innocence and offering to cooperate with police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No. 992/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition filed by Mekala Anji and Jegan, who were arrested on 06.02.2026 for allegedly committing theft of an Oppo cellphone from a bus passenger on 05.02.2026 under Section 304 of BNS. The court denied bail citing the grave nature of the offense, pending investigation, the petitioners' previous criminal records, risk of absconding, and property value involved, despite the accused claiming innocence and offering to cooperate with police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case