Vijayakumar vs The Inspector of Police, Thirunindravur police station, Cr.No. 105/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 947/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),296(b),118(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010018942026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
1203/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
947/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
Thiruninravur Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijayakumar
Adv. RAJASEKAR E
Vinoth
Adv. RAJASEKAR E
Saravanan
Adv. RAJASEKAR E
Sangeetha
Adv. RAJASEKAR E
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of Police, Thirunindravur police station, Cr.No. 105/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 17-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 947/2026 Summary: The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vijayakumar, Vinoth, Saravanan, and Sangeetha in a case involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and alleged theft of gold jewelry under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 118(2) r/w TNPWH Act. The court found the offense grave in nature, investigation at preliminary stage, and property value significant, rendering the case premature for bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 947/2026 Summary: The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vijayakumar, Vinoth, Saravanan, and Sangeetha in a case involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and alleged theft of gold jewelry under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 118(2) r/w TNPWH Act. The court found the offense grave in nature, investigation at preliminary stage, and property value significant, rendering the case premature for bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts