Karthik Lal Harijan vs The Inspector of police, Gummidipoondi ps, Cr. No. 238/2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 886/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010017882026
Filing Number
1137/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
886/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
238
Police Station
Gummidipoondi. P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karthik Lal Harijan
Adv. M.Anbarasu
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of police, Gummidipoondi ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 238/2025 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted bail to Karthik Lal Harijan, accused of murder under Section 103 BNS, after he spent 158 days in custody. The court found that continued incarceration served no purpose since the investigation was complete and the chargesheet had been filed. Bail was granted on condition of a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to the magistrate for 30 days, and potential re-arrest if conditions were violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to Karthik Lal Harijan, accused of murder under Section 103 BNS, after he spent 158 days in custody. The court found that continued incarceration served no purpose since the investigation was complete and the chargesheet had been filed. Bail was granted on condition of a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to the magistrate for 30 days, and potential re-arrest if conditions were violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts