MARUTHI PRASAD (a) MARUTHI PRASANTH vs The Inspector of Police, Kankamachathiram Police station, Crime No 58 /2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 876/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010017622026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
1120/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
876/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
K.K.Chatram P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MARUTHI PRASAD (a) MARUTHI PRASANTH
Adv. Ranesh D
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of Police, Kankamachathiram Police station, Crime No 58 /2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 16-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted anticipatory bail to Maruthi Prasad in a case involving alleged assault and abusive language against a neighbor in a land dispute matter. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given that the petitioner is a first offender and local resident, the investigation was substantially complete, and the victim had been discharged from hospital. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, surrender within 15 days, and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur granted anticipatory bail to Maruthi Prasad in a case involving alleged assault and abusive language against a neighbor in a land dispute matter. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given that the petitioner is a first offender and local resident, the investigation was substantially complete, and the victim had been discharged from hospital. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, surrender within 15 days, and daily police reporting for 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts