Logesh (a) Ettaiya vs The Inspector of police, T5 Thiruverkadu ps, Cr. No. 13/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 873/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 125, 324(2), 311, 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010017512026

Filing Number

1109/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

873/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 125, 324(2), 311, 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Logesh (a) Ettaiya

    Adv. D.Udhayakumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, T5 Thiruverkadu ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 13/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of Logesh, who was arrested for alleged armed robbery involving knife assault and theft of Rs.18,000. The court rejected bail citing the grave nature of the offence, pending investigation, the petitioner's ten previous criminal cases creating risk of absconding or reoffending, and unrecovered stolen property, finding no change in circumstances since the previous bail dismissal on 17.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 873/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of Logesh, who was arrested for alleged armed robbery involving knife assault and theft of Rs.18,000. The court rejected bail citing the grave nature of the offence, pending investigation, the petitioner's ten previous criminal cases creating risk of absconding or reoffending, and unrecovered stolen property, finding no change in circumstances since the previous bail dismissal on 17.02.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case