Churchill (a) Loyola Rosario Churchill vs The Inspector of Police, T4 Pudur Police Station,Avadi Commissionerate, Cr.No. Not known/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 853/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTR010016742026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
1067/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
853/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Tiruvallur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Churchill (a) Loyola Rosario Churchill
Adv. GOVINDARAJ LOGANATHAN
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of Police, T4 Pudur Police Station,Avadi Commissionerate, Cr.No. Not known/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 03-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Churchill sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS in connection with allegations of issuing fake appointment orders for government hospitals and receiving ₹28 lakhs. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur dismissed the petition, finding the enquiry was at a preliminary stage with no FIR registered, the petitioner failed to produce necessary documents despite cooperation claims, and the serious nature of the accusations warranted denial of bail at this premature stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Churchill sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS in connection with allegations of issuing fake appointment orders for government hospitals and receiving ₹28 lakhs. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur dismissed the petition, finding the enquiry was at a preliminary stage with no FIR registered, the petitioner failed to produce necessary documents despite cooperation claims, and the serious nature of the accusations warranted denial of bail at this premature stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts