Churchill (a) Loyola Rosario Churchill vs The Inspector of Police, T4 Pudur Police Station,Avadi Commissionerate, Cr.No. Not known/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 853/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010016742026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

1067/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

853/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420

Petitioner(s)

Churchill (a) Loyola Rosario Churchill

Adv. GOVINDARAJ LOGANATHAN

Respondent(s)

The Inspector of Police, T4 Pudur Police Station,Avadi Commissionerate, Cr.No. Not known/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

18-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Enquiry

07-03-2026

Issue of Service

03-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: Churchill sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS in connection with allegations of issuing fake appointment orders for government hospitals and receiving ₹28 lakhs. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur dismissed the petition, finding the enquiry was at a preliminary stage with no FIR registered, the petitioner failed to produce necessary documents despite cooperation claims, and the serious nature of the accusations warranted denial of bail at this premature stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Churchill sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS in connection with allegations of issuing fake appointment orders for government hospitals and receiving ₹28 lakhs. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur dismissed the petition, finding the enquiry was at a preliminary stage with no FIR registered, the petitioner failed to produce necessary documents despite cooperation claims, and the serious nature of the accusations warranted denial of bail at this premature stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case