Aravindhan vs The Inspector of police, Ambattur ps, Cr. No. 38/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 782/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 115(2), 125, 324(2), 309(4), 311, 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTR010015732026

Filing Number

991/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

782/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Tiruvallur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 115(2), 125, 324(2), 309(4), 311, 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aravindhan

    Adv. A.Amulraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of police, Ambattur ps (Police Station), Cr. No. 38/2026 Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Aravindhan, who was accused of armed robbery at knife point (Rs. 650/-) under serious BNS sections including dacoity (s. 311). The court denied bail citing the grave nature of the offence, pending investigation, the petitioner's two prior criminal cases, and risk of absconding, which could jeopardize investigations in multiple cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 782/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Tiruvallur dismissed the bail petition of Aravindhan, who was accused of armed robbery at knife point (Rs. 650/-) under serious BNS sections including dacoity (s. 311). The court denied bail citing the grave nature of the offence, pending investigation, the petitioner's two prior criminal cases, and risk of absconding, which could jeopardize investigations in multiple cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case