Perumal vs Manickavel — 18/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 25 (b). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNTM220008352025
Filing Number
907/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
18/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
Sub Court, Polur
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Polur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Perumal
Adv. G.ARISTATIL
-
2.Desingh
-
3.Kuppusamy
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manickavel
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
In Appeal Suit No. 18/2025, the Subordinate Judge at Polur dismissed the appellants' (Perumal, Desingh, Kuppusamy) appeal against the District Munsif Court's 2015 judgment as "not pressed" after the appellants' counsel declined to pursue it during final hearing on 13 March 2026. The appeal, which challenged the lower court's dismissal of the original suit filed by Manickavel in 2008 regarding a property dispute, was consequently dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge, Polur
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge, Polur
-
08-Jan-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge, Polur
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 18/2025
In Appeal Suit No. 18/2025, the Subordinate Judge at Polur dismissed the appellants' (Perumal, Desingh, Kuppusamy) appeal against the District Munsif Court's 2015 judgment as "not pressed" after the appellants' counsel declined to pursue it during final hearing on 13 March 2026. The appeal, which challenged the lower court's dismissal of the original suit filed by Manickavel in 2008 regarding a property dispute, was consequently dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts