R. Annamalai vs M.Abdhul kadhar — 44/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S22. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled out of court on 28th April 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM220000832026

Filing Number

94/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

44/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

Sub Court, Polur

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Polur

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled out of court

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R. Annamalai

    Adv. M.SAMPATHRAJAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.Abdhul kadhar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 44/2026 The Subordinate Court, Polur dismissed the suit filed by R. Annamalai against M. Abdul Kadhar on April 28, 2026, as settled out of court. The dispute concerned specific performance of a property sale agreement dated July 5, 2022, involving an advance of Rs. 3,00,000 for a property valued at Rs. 3,50,000 in Allinagar village. The court ordered refund of court fees to the plaintiff and imposed no costs on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Polur

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 44/2026 The Subordinate Court, Polur dismissed the suit filed by R. Annamalai against M. Abdul Kadhar on April 28, 2026, as settled out of court. The dispute concerned specific performance of a property sale agreement dated July 5, 2022, involving an advance of Rs. 3,00,000 for a property valued at Rs. 3,50,000 in Allinagar village. The court ordered refund of court fees to the plaintiff and imposed no costs on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case