Malar vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADALADI POLICE STATION — 567/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010009582026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

672/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

567/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Kadaladi Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

1.Malar

Adv. THIRU. M. SIVAKUMAR
2.Subramaniyan

Adv. THIRU. M. SIVAKUMAR
3.Venkatesan

Adv. THIRU. M. SIVAKUMAR
4.Sengottaiyan

Adv. THIRU. M. SIVAKUMAR

Respondent(s)

1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADALADI POLICE STATION

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
13-Mar-2026

Bail orderView PDF

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Malar, Subramaniyan, Venkatesan, and Sengottaiyan under Section 482 BNSS. The court rejected bail for alleged offences including criminal intimidation, assault, and abusive language against a public official, citing that the injured party remained hospitalized, investigation was incomplete, and the prosecution raised strong objections to bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
13-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District & Sessions Judge
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 567/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Malar, Subramaniyan, Venkatesan, and Sengottaiyan under Section 482 BNSS. The court rejected bail for alleged offences including criminal intimidation, assault, and abusive language against a public official, citing that the injured party remained hospitalized, investigation was incomplete, and the prosecution raised strong objections to bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.