R.SATHIVEL vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION TIRUVANNAMALAI — 505/2026

Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010008572026

Filing Number

592/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

505/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.SATHIVEL

    Adv. THIRU.C.PALANISAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION TIRUVANNAMALAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail orderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of R. Sathivel, a Firka Surveyor accused of demanding and receiving a bribe of Rs. 5,000 from a complainant for performing his official duty of measuring and recommending property subdivision, in violation of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988. The court rejected bail due to the serious nature of the corruption offense against government service, ongoing investigation, and the prosecution's strong objections, including phenolphthalein test evidence corroborating bribe receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 505/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of R. Sathivel, a Firka Surveyor accused of demanding and receiving a bribe of Rs. 5,000 from a complainant for performing his official duty of measuring and recommending property subdivision, in violation of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988. The court rejected bail due to the serious nature of the corruption offense against government service, ongoing investigation, and the prosecution's strong objections, including phenolphthalein test evidence corroborating bribe receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case