R.SATHIVEL vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION TIRUVANNAMALAI — 505/2026
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTM010008572026
Filing Number
592/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
505/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.SATHIVEL
Adv. THIRU.C.PALANISAMY
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION TIRUVANNAMALAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Disposed
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Await Reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of R. Sathivel, a Firka Surveyor accused of demanding and receiving a bribe of Rs. 5,000 from a complainant for performing his official duty of measuring and recommending property subdivision, in violation of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988. The court rejected bail due to the serious nature of the corruption offense against government service, ongoing investigation, and the prosecution's strong objections, including phenolphthalein test evidence corroborating bribe receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of R. Sathivel, a Firka Surveyor accused of demanding and receiving a bribe of Rs. 5,000 from a complainant for performing his official duty of measuring and recommending property subdivision, in violation of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988. The court rejected bail due to the serious nature of the corruption offense against government service, ongoing investigation, and the prosecution's strong objections, including phenolphthalein test evidence corroborating bribe receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts