PA MU A VEE Seetha Trust Pattukottai vs Akbar — 9/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 21 rule 11. Disposed: Contested--Terminated on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNTJ100000152026

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

16/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

District Munsif Court, Pattukottai

Judge

3-District Munsif

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Terminated

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 21 rule 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PA MU A VEE Seetha Trust Pattukottai

    Adv. Jeyaveerapandiyan R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Akbar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District Munsif court terminated the execution petition (EP) filed by PA MU A VEE Seetha Trust against respondent Akbar for recovery of property possession. Since physical delivery of the property had already been taken on 25.03.2026 and the Rent Tribunal had granted a stay, the court found the execution petition infructuous and terminated it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Batta

    District Munsif

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Batta

    District Munsif

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Batta

    District Munsif

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Batta

    District Munsif

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  9. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif court terminated the execution petition (EP) filed by PA MU A VEE Seetha Trust against respondent Akbar for recovery of property possession. Since physical delivery of the property had already been taken on 25.03.2026 and the Rent Tribunal had granted a stay, the court found the execution petition infructuous and terminated it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case