Shanmugam rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj vs Sumsudheen Advocate - Thillairajan. S — 238/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O.7,R.1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ010099292024
Filing Number
3514/2024
Filing Date
29-08-2024
Registration No
238/2024
Registration Date
06-09-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shanmugam rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
Adv. S.Thenmozhi
Rajendran rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
Adv. Kannaki. R
Ashokkumar Jain rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
Manimaran rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
Nancy rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
Arokiyadoss rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
Samuvel Arockiyaraj
Respondent(s)
Sumsudheen Advocate - Thillairajan. S
Jothimani
Adv. Mrs.R.Kannaki
Jenifer
Adv. Mrs.R.Kannaki
Minor. Robin Johnes rep by him Next friend and Guardian Jenifer
Adv. Mrs.R.Kannaki
Minor. Rodum Jenis rep by him Next friend and Guardian Jenifer
Adv. Mrs.R.Kannaki
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District Judge of Thanjavur dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration of absolute ownership of certain properties and permanent injunction against defendants 2-5 from interfering with their possession, finding insufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs' claims. The court ordered no costs against either party, with plaintiffs bearing their own institution fee of Rs. 98,314. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Principal District Judge of Thanjavur dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration of absolute ownership of certain properties and permanent injunction against defendants 2-5 from interfering with their possession, finding insufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs' claims. The court ordered no costs against either party, with plaintiffs bearing their own institution fee of Rs. 98,314. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts