Shanmugam rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj vs Sumsudheen Advocate - Thillairajan. S — 238/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7,R.1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ010099292024
Filing Number
3514/2024
Filing Date
29-Aug-2024
Registration No
238/2024
Registration Date
06-Sep-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shanmugam rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
Adv. S.Thenmozhi
-
2.Rajendran rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
Adv. Kannaki. R
-
3.Ashokkumar Jain rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
-
4.Manimaran rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
-
5.Nancy rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
-
6.Arokiyadoss rep by power agent Samuvel Arockiyaraj
-
7.Samuvel Arockiyaraj
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sumsudheen Advocate - Thillairajan. S
-
2.Jothimani
Adv. Mrs.R.Kannaki
-
3.Jenifer
Adv. Mrs.R.Kannaki
-
4.Minor. Robin Johnes rep by him Next friend and Guardian Jenifer
Adv. Mrs.R.Kannaki
-
5.Minor. Rodum Jenis rep by him Next friend and Guardian Jenifer
Adv. Mrs.R.Kannaki
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of DecreeView PDF
The Principal District Judge of Thanjavur dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration of absolute ownership of certain properties and permanent injunction against defendants 2-5 from interfering with their possession, finding insufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs' claims. The court ordered no costs against either party, with plaintiffs bearing their own institution fee of Rs. 98,314. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
01-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
27-Mar-2025
Deposition of WitnessView PDF
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
13-Mar-2025
Deposition of WitnessView PDF
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
14-Feb-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
31-Jan-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
24-Jan-2025
Issues
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
20-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
06-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
22-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
16-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
06-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 238/2024
The Principal District Judge of Thanjavur dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration of absolute ownership of certain properties and permanent injunction against defendants 2-5 from interfering with their possession, finding insufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs' claims. The court ordered no costs against either party, with plaintiffs bearing their own institution fee of Rs. 98,314. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts