Keerthan vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, Vallam ps Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1625/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ010020822026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
1622/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
1625/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
Vallam Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Keerthan
Adv. Sangeeth S
Akash
Adv. Sangeeth S
Joseph
Adv. Sangeeth S
Respondent(s)
State Government rep by the inspector of police, Vallam ps (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused (Keerthan, Akash, and Joseph) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) for causing injuries with weapons during a quarrel. The court found that given the pending investigation, nature and gravity of the offence, and the prosecution's strong objection citing risk of further offences, granting anticipatory bail was undesirable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused (Keerthan, Akash, and Joseph) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) for causing injuries with weapons during a quarrel. The court found that given the pending investigation, nature and gravity of the offence, and the prosecution's strong objection citing risk of further offences, granting anticipatory bail was undesirable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts