Keerthan vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, Vallam ps Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1625/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010020822026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

1622/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

1625/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

75

Police Station

Vallam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Keerthan

    Adv. Sangeeth S

  2. 2.Akash

    Adv. Sangeeth S

  3. 3.Joseph

    Adv. Sangeeth S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government rep by the inspector of police, Vallam ps (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused (Keerthan, Akash, and Joseph) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) for causing injuries with weapons during a quarrel. The court found that given the pending investigation, nature and gravity of the offence, and the prosecution's strong objection citing risk of further offences, granting anticipatory bail was undesirable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1625/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused (Keerthan, Akash, and Joseph) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) for causing injuries with weapons during a quarrel. The court found that given the pending investigation, nature and gravity of the offence, and the prosecution's strong objection citing risk of further offences, granting anticipatory bail was undesirable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case