Jerisan Infant Doniyo vs State Rep by S.I of Police, Vallam Police Station Advocate - M. Saravanan — 1621/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ010020772026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
1617/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
1621/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
76
Police Station
Vallam Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jerisan Infant Doniyo
Adv. Saravanan
-
2.Livinkumar
Adv. Saravanan
-
3.Gurushyam Anthoniraj
Adv. Saravanan
-
4.Kutty Alias Anthony Prabakaran
Adv. Saravanan
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Rep by S.I of Police, Vallam Police Station Advocate - M. Saravanan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by four accused persons charged with assault under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The court found that the serious nature of injuries sustained by the complainant (34 and 7 stitches on head and hand), the pending investigation, the potential inclusion of attempt to murder charges, and strong objections from both the complainant and prosecution warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
10-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1621/2026
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by four accused persons charged with assault under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The court found that the serious nature of injuries sustained by the complainant (34 and 7 stitches on head and hand), the pending investigation, the potential inclusion of attempt to murder charges, and strong objections from both the complainant and prosecution warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts