Jerisan Infant Doniyo vs State Rep by S.I of Police, Vallam Police Station Advocate - M. Saravanan — 1621/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010020772026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

1617/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

1621/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

76

Police Station

Vallam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

Jerisan Infant Doniyo

Adv. Saravanan

Livinkumar

Adv. Saravanan

Gurushyam Anthoniraj

Adv. Saravanan

Kutty Alias Anthony Prabakaran

Adv. Saravanan

Respondent(s)

State Rep by S.I of Police, Vallam Police Station Advocate - M. Saravanan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Issue of Service

05-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by four accused persons charged with assault under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The court found that the serious nature of injuries sustained by the complainant (34 and 7 stitches on head and hand), the pending investigation, the potential inclusion of attempt to murder charges, and strong objections from both the complainant and prosecution warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by four accused persons charged with assault under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3). The court found that the serious nature of injuries sustained by the complainant (34 and 7 stitches on head and hand), the pending investigation, the potential inclusion of attempt to murder charges, and strong objections from both the complainant and prosecution warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case