Vetriachandaran vs The Inspector of Police, Uthukuli PS Advocate - Additional Public Prosecutor — 288/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI230004402026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

431/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

288/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vetriachandaran

    Adv. Kumar M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police, Uthukuli PS (Police Station) Advocate - Additional Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court granted bail to Vetri Chandran, accused of offences under Sections 296(b) and 308(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, finding that continued judicial custody was unnecessary for investigation. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, and abstention from similar offences during bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 288/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Vetri Chandran, accused of offences under Sections 296(b) and 308(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, finding that continued judicial custody was unnecessary for investigation. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with evidence, and abstention from similar offences during bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case