P.Rajendran vs Muthusamy and one another Advocate - Vijay K — 15/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 16th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI140003152022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
336/2022
Filing Date
07-12-2022
Registration No
15/2023
Registration Date
11-01-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Kangeyam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Rajendran
Adv. Vadivelsamy P
Respondent(s)
Muthusamy and one another Advocate - Vijay K
G. Rajendran
Adv. Naveen N
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Disposed
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 19-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 16-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Copy of Judgment
Interim Orders
The District Munsif Court in Kangayam allowed an interim application (I.A. 4/2025) permitting the applicant to file supplementary evidence in support of his earlier petition (I.A. 2/2023) to dismiss the original suit, based on alleged typographical errors in his affidavit regarding property ownership and possession. The court imposed two conditions: the applicant must pay ₹750 as costs to the opposite party by November 28, 2025, and both parties must proceed diligently with the original case without delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Munsif Court in Kangayam allowed an interim application (I.A. 4/2025) permitting the applicant to file supplementary evidence in support of his earlier petition (I.A. 2/2023) to dismiss the original suit, based on alleged typographical errors in his affidavit regarding property ownership and possession. The court imposed two conditions: the applicant must pay ₹750 as costs to the opposite party by November 28, 2025, and both parties must proceed diligently with the original case without delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts