Manodikrush vs Sankar — 5/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV080000052024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
5/2024
Filing Date
23-01-2024
Registration No
5/2024
Registration Date
23-01-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manodikrush
Adv. K.Habeebur Rahman
Respondent(s)
Sankar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Orders
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Orders |
| 08-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 27-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Manodikrush v. Sankar (5/2024) On 10.04.2026, the District Munsif Court, Manamadurai partially allowed the petitioner's application seeking condonation of delay in filing documents. The court admitted three documents (exhibits 1-3) as evidence, following the Supreme Court principle in *Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat* regarding admissibility objections. However, the fourth document was rejected as it was issued by an unauthorized authority (village administrator instead of proper revenue official). No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Manodikrush v. Sankar (5/2024) On 10.04.2026, the District Munsif Court, Manamadurai partially allowed the petitioner's application seeking condonation of delay in filing documents. The court admitted three documents (exhibits 1-3) as evidence, following the Supreme Court principle in *Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat* regarding admissibility objections. However, the fourth document was rejected as it was issued by an unauthorized authority (village administrator instead of proper revenue official). No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts