Vijay vs Inspector of Police Singampunari P.S — 537/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV010009052026
Filing Number
721/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
537/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
Singampunari Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijay
Adv. Prabakaran M
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police Singampunari P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Disposed
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cr.M.P.No.537/2026 (Vijay vs. Inspector of Police Singampunari P.S) The court granted bail to 22-year-old Vijay, who was charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 76, and 351(3) for allegedly using criminal force against a woman, attempting to disrobe her, abusing her with filthy language, assaulting her with an iron pipe, and threatening her. Although the Public Prosecutor opposed bail citing pending investigation and prior POCSO cases, the court found changed circumstances warranted release: the injured was discharged from hospital, investigation was nearly complete, and Vijay had been in custody since January 27, 2026. Bail was granted on Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, requiring daily police station sign-ins for 30 days and strict conditions including non-interference with witnesses, non-departure from Tamil Nadu, and availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P.No.537/2026 (Vijay vs. Inspector of Police Singampunari P.S) The court granted bail to 22-year-old Vijay, who was charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 76, and 351(3) for allegedly using criminal force against a woman, attempting to disrobe her, abusing her with filthy language, assaulting her with an iron pipe, and threatening her. Although the Public Prosecutor opposed bail citing pending investigation and prior POCSO cases, the court found changed circumstances warranted release: the injured was discharged from hospital, investigation was nearly complete, and Vijay had been in custody since January 27, 2026. Bail was granted on Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, requiring daily police station sign-ins for 30 days and strict conditions including non-interference with witnesses, non-departure from Tamil Nadu, and availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts