Krishnamoorthy vs Inspector of Police Karaikudi North P.S — 529/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV010008842026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
705/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
529/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
525
Police Station
Karaikudi North Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishnamoorthy
Adv. SS Babu prasadh
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police Karaikudi North P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 18-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 17-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 529/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed Krishnamoorthy's anticipatory bail petition for a robbery case involving ₹25,00,000 and a two-wheeler. The court rejected bail citing: this was his fourth such application, the petitioner is the prime accused with four prior criminal cases, he absconded since December 22, 2024, investigation remains pending, and no changed circumstances existed to warrant reconsideration. The judge found serious grounds for concern that release could lead to witness intimidation and further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 529/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed Krishnamoorthy's anticipatory bail petition for a robbery case involving ₹25,00,000 and a two-wheeler. The court rejected bail citing: this was his fourth such application, the petitioner is the prime accused with four prior criminal cases, he absconded since December 22, 2024, investigation remains pending, and no changed circumstances existed to warrant reconsideration. The judge found serious grounds for concern that release could lead to witness intimidation and further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts