Jeya subbu vs Inspector of Police Sivagangai town P.S — 514/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV010008712026

Filing Number

696/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

514/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

621

Police Station

Sivagangai Town Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jeya subbu

    Adv. VALMEKANATHAN.S

  2. 2.Alaguvignesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Sivagangai town P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai dismissed the bail petition of two accused (Jeya Subbu and Alaguvignesh) charged with murder, rioting, and unlawful assembly under the BNS Act. The court denied bail citing serious objections from the prosecution, pending investigation, and the petitioner's criminal antecedents (involvement in six previous cases), despite some co-accused already being released on bail by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 514/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai dismissed the bail petition of two accused (Jeya Subbu and Alaguvignesh) charged with murder, rioting, and unlawful assembly under the BNS Act. The court denied bail citing serious objections from the prosecution, pending investigation, and the petitioner's criminal antecedents (involvement in six previous cases), despite some co-accused already being released on bail by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case