Rengasamy vs Inspector of Police Devakottai Taluk P.S — 506/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV010008632026

Filing Number

688/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

506/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Devakottai Taluk Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rengasamy

    Adv. MUNIANDI I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Devakottai Taluk P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai dismissed the bail petition of Rengasamy (age 20), the third accused in Crime No. 17/2026, charged under sections 109(1), 296(b), and 103(1) of the BNS Act. The court found that since investigation remains pending, the petitioner is detained under the Goondas Act, and his first bail application was already dismissed on identical grounds with no change in circumstances, granting bail posed an absconding risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 506/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai dismissed the bail petition of Rengasamy (age 20), the third accused in Crime No. 17/2026, charged under sections 109(1), 296(b), and 103(1) of the BNS Act. The court found that since investigation remains pending, the petitioner is detained under the Goondas Act, and his first bail application was already dismissed on identical grounds with no change in circumstances, granting bail posed an absconding risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case