Praveen Alias Thiyagarajan vs Inspector of Police Sivagangai taluk P.S — 491/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV010008412026

Filing Number

672/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

491/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

79

Police Station

Sivagangai Taluk Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Praveen Alias Thiyagarajan

    Adv. KANNAN.M

  2. 2.Mohammed Satham Ushen

  3. 3.Ajithkumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Sivagangai taluk P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai granted bail to three accused (A1, A2, A3) charged with abusing and assaulting a complainant with intent to murder under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 109, and 351(3). The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each with two sureties, daily police station reporting in Dindigul for 30 days, residence restriction in Tamil Nadu, availability for interrogation, and a prohibition on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Sivagangai

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 491/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai granted bail to three accused (A1, A2, A3) charged with abusing and assaulting a complainant with intent to murder under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 109, and 351(3). The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each with two sureties, daily police station reporting in Dindigul for 30 days, residence restriction in Tamil Nadu, availability for interrogation, and a prohibition on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case