Balan and 4 others vs Madhesh and 6 others Advocate - L.Ganapathy Subramanian — 196/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OrVII.r.1-6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170002622024
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
330/2024
Filing Date
17-10-2024
Registration No
196/2024
Registration Date
19-10-2024
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balan and 4 others
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. M. P.
Perumal
Adv. M.P.Senthil Kumar
Munusamy
Adv. M.P.Senthil Kumar
Govindaraj
Adv. M.P.Senthil Kumar
Sekar
Adv. M.P.Senthil Kumar
Respondent(s)
Madhesh and 6 others Advocate - L.Ganapathy Subramanian
Perumal
Adv. L.Ganapathy Subramanian
The District Collector, Collectorate
Adv. Government Pleader
The Sub Collector, Mettur
Adv. Government Pleader
The Tahildar, Mettur
Adv. Government Pleader
The Block Development Officer, Village Panchyath
Adv. Government Pleader
The President, Navapatti Village Panchayath
Adv. Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 06-01-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 13-11-2025 | IA Pending | |
| 09-09-2025 | IA Pending | |
| 24-07-2025 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The District Civil Court, Mettur (dated February 7, 2025) dismissed the petition filed by villagers seeking to set aside an earlier judgment (A.S. No. 20/2021) and obtain a temporary injunction restraining defendants from blocking a public pathway. The court found that while petitioners established a prima facie case regarding the disputed road (Survey No. 330/17), they failed to demonstrate irreparable injury or that balance of convenience favored granting interim relief, especially since alternative routes exist for public access to government facilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The District Civil Court, Mettur (dated February 7, 2025) dismissed the petition filed by villagers seeking to set aside an earlier judgment (A.S. No. 20/2021) and obtain a temporary injunction restraining defendants from blocking a public pathway. The court found that while petitioners established a prima facie case regarding the disputed road (Survey No. 330/17), they failed to demonstrate irreparable injury or that balance of convenience favored granting interim relief, especially since alternative routes exist for public access to government facilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts