ANNAMALAI vs CHINNARAJ AND OTHERS Advocate - SENTHILKUMAR. S.K — 121/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1TO6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 16-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170001852022

Filing Number

239/2022

Filing Date

22-Jul-2022

Registration No

121/2022

Registration Date

22-Jul-2022

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1TO6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANNAMALAI

    Adv. M.P.SENTHIL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHINNARAJ AND OTHERS Advocate - SENTHILKUMAR. S.K

  2. 2.Selvasekar

    Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. S.K

  3. 3.Murugesan

    Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. S.K

  4. 4.The Sub-Registrar, Mecheri

    Adv. Govt. Pleader

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  6. 05-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  7. 09-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  8. 09-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  9. 06-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  10. 08-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  11. 23-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  12. 15-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  13. 10-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  14. 16-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  15. 05-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  16. 01-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  17. 31-Jul-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  18. 31-Jul-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case: I.M. No. 03/2022 | District Civil Court, Mettur Outcome: The petition is ALLOWED. The court appointed S. Kanagarathinam as Court Commissioner with a fee of ₹9,000 to inspect and survey the properties (Schedules A, B, and C) and submit a detailed report with measurements and drawings by October 1, 2024, to resolve the property boundary and right-of-way dispute between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 31-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  20. 19-Jul-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  21. 13-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  22. 16-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  23. 20-Mar-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  24. 07-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  25. 21-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  26. 28-Nov-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  27. 04-Oct-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  28. 23-Aug-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  29. 13-Jul-2023

    Appearance

    District Munsif, Mettur

  30. 13-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  31. 20-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  32. 30-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  33. 22-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  34. 24-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  35. 27-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  36. 22-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Mettur

  37. 22-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 22-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 121/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: I.M. No. 03/2022 | District Civil Court, Mettur Outcome: The petition is ALLOWED. The court appointed S. Kanagarathinam as Court Commissioner with a fee of ₹9,000 to inspect and survey the properties (Schedules A, B, and C) and submit a detailed report with measurements and drawings by October 1, 2024, to resolve the property boundary and right-of-way dispute between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case