Karupannan vs paramasivan Advocate - L.GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN — 99/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o.7R1-6. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

Trial Next hearing 26-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170001542022

Filing Number

195/2022

Filing Date

08-Jun-2022

Registration No

99/2022

Registration Date

08-Jun-2022

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o.7R1-6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karupannan

    Adv. K.Sathiyapriya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.paramasivan Advocate - L.GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN

  2. 2.Madhammal

    Adv. SIVAPRAKASHAM. S.

  3. 3.Muthusamy

    Adv. SIVAPRAKASHAM. S.

  4. 4.Palanisamy

    Adv. Selvam N

  5. 5.jayammal

    Adv. Selvam N

Case History

  1. 26-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  3. 04-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  5. 17-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  6. 09-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  7. 08-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  8. 19-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  9. 18-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  10. 26-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  11. 22-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  12. 25-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  13. 30-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  14. 29-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  15. 21-Oct-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  16. 21-Oct-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Order Summary The District Civil Court at Mettur allowed the petition filed under CPC Order 26 Rule 9 and Section 151, appointing Ms. Srimega as court commissioner to investigate and report on a disputed pathway. The commissioner is directed to verify whether a 156-foot long, 10-foot wide pathway exists through property S.No. 169/1B4 connecting the plaintiffs' property (S.No. 169/1B3) to a main road, and to survey the boundaries of both properties with the assistance of village administrative and survey officials. The court commissioner's fee is fixed at ₹10,000, payable by the plaintiffs, with the report due by 29.11.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 21-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  18. 03-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  19. 03-Sep-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  20. 16-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  21. 26-Jun-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  22. 20-Jun-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  23. 14-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  24. 11-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  25. 10-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  26. 07-Jun-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  27. 07-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  28. 04-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  29. 12-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  30. 05-Mar-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  31. 22-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  32. 07-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  33. 11-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    District Munsif, Mettur

  34. 09-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  35. 09-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  36. 07-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  37. 23-Aug-2023

    Additional Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  38. 28-Jul-2023

    Additional Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  39. 25-Jul-2023

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Mettur

  40. 17-Jul-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  41. 03-Jul-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  42. 01-Jun-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  43. 25-Apr-2023

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Mettur

  44. 17-Apr-2023

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Mettur

  45. 20-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  46. 27-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  47. 20-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  48. 24-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  49. 16-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  50. 30-Sep-2022

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  51. 16-Sep-2022

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  52. 10-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  53. 07-Sep-2022

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  54. 07-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  55. 04-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  56. 07-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  57. 08-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 08-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The District Civil Court at Mettur allowed the petition filed under CPC Order 26 Rule 9 and Section 151, appointing Ms. Srimega as court commissioner to investigate and report on a disputed pathway. The commissioner is directed to verify whether a 156-foot long, 10-foot wide pathway exists through property S.No. 169/1B4 connecting the plaintiffs' property (S.No. 169/1B3) to a main road, and to survey the boundaries of both properties with the assistance of village administrative and survey officials. The court commissioner's fee is fixed at ₹10,000, payable by the plaintiffs, with the report due by 29.11.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case