Thangaraj vs Ponnusamy and 5 others Advocate - ALAGESAN N — 52/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o7R1-6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170000722022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
109/2022
Filing Date
04-04-2022
Registration No
52/2022
Registration Date
04-04-2022
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thangaraj
Adv. P.Rajkumar
Respondent(s)
Ponnusamy and 5 others Advocate - ALAGESAN N
Arunachalam
Adv. ALAGESAN N
The District Collector
Adv. Govt. Pleader
The Sub Collector, Mettur.
Adv. Govt. Pleader
The Tahsildar
Adv. Govt. Pleader
The Village Administrative Officer
Adv. Govt. Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 11-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 08-12-2025 | IA Pending |
| 05-11-2025 | IA Pending |
| 19-09-2025 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: I.M. No. 04/2022 | District Court, Madurai | Date: June 18, 2024 Outcome: The petition is allowed without opposition. The court granted both permanent and temporary injunctions in favor of the petitioner against the respondents regarding a land dispute involving a public pathway (S.No. 282/1A1 and 282/2). Key Orders: (1) Petitioner has the right to use the government land (S.No. 282/2) for accessing the public pathway to reach his property; (2) Respondents are restrained from obstructing the petitioner's use of the pathway; (3) Respondents must restore the altered pathway structure to its original condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: I.M. No. 04/2022 | District Court, Madurai | Date: June 18, 2024 Outcome: The petition is allowed without opposition. The court granted both permanent and temporary injunctions in favor of the petitioner against the respondents regarding a land dispute involving a public pathway (S.No. 282/1A1 and 282/2). Key Orders: (1) Petitioner has the right to use the government land (S.No. 282/2) for accessing the public pathway to reach his property; (2) Respondents are restrained from obstructing the petitioner's use of the pathway; (3) Respondents must restore the altered pathway structure to its original condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts