Thangaraj vs Ponnusamy and 5 others Advocate - ALAGESAN N — 52/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o7R1-6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170000722022

IA Pending

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

109/2022

Filing Date

04-04-2022

Registration No

52/2022

Registration Date

04-04-2022

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o7R1-6

Petitioner(s)

Thangaraj

Adv. P.Rajkumar

Respondent(s)

Ponnusamy and 5 others Advocate - ALAGESAN N

Arunachalam

Adv. ALAGESAN N

The District Collector

Adv. Govt. Pleader

The Sub Collector, Mettur.

Adv. Govt. Pleader

The Tahsildar

Adv. Govt. Pleader

The Village Administrative Officer

Adv. Govt. Pleader

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur

05-03-2026

IA Pending

11-02-2026

IA Pending

08-12-2025

IA Pending

05-11-2025

IA Pending

19-09-2025

IA Pending

Interim Orders

18-06-2024
Copy of Judgment

Court Order Summary Case: I.M. No. 04/2022 | District Court, Madurai | Date: June 18, 2024 Outcome: The petition is allowed without opposition. The court granted both permanent and temporary injunctions in favor of the petitioner against the respondents regarding a land dispute involving a public pathway (S.No. 282/1A1 and 282/2). Key Orders: (1) Petitioner has the right to use the government land (S.No. 282/2) for accessing the public pathway to reach his property; (2) Respondents are restrained from obstructing the petitioner's use of the pathway; (3) Respondents must restore the altered pathway structure to its original condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: I.M. No. 04/2022 | District Court, Madurai | Date: June 18, 2024 Outcome: The petition is allowed without opposition. The court granted both permanent and temporary injunctions in favor of the petitioner against the respondents regarding a land dispute involving a public pathway (S.No. 282/1A1 and 282/2). Key Orders: (1) Petitioner has the right to use the government land (S.No. 282/2) for accessing the public pathway to reach his property; (2) Respondents are restrained from obstructing the petitioner's use of the pathway; (3) Respondents must restore the altered pathway structure to its original condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munisf Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case