Thangaraj vs Ponnusamy and 5 others Advocate - ALAGESAN N — 52/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o7R1-6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170000722022
Filing Number
109/2022
Filing Date
04-Apr-2022
Registration No
52/2022
Registration Date
04-Apr-2022
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thangaraj
Adv. P.Rajkumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ponnusamy and 5 others Advocate - ALAGESAN N
-
2.Arunachalam
Adv. ALAGESAN N
-
3.The District Collector
Adv. Govt. Pleader
-
4.The Sub Collector, Mettur.
Adv. Govt. Pleader
-
5.The Tahsildar
Adv. Govt. Pleader
-
6.The Village Administrative Officer
Adv. Govt. Pleader
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
11-Feb-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
19-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
17-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
07-Apr-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Feb-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Jan-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Nov-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Sep-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Jul-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Jun-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
18-Jun-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
18-Jun-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
18-Jun-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: I.M. No. 04/2022 | District Court, Madurai | Date: June 18, 2024 Outcome: The petition is allowed without opposition. The court granted both permanent and temporary injunctions in favor of the petitioner against the respondents regarding a land dispute involving a public pathway (S.No. 282/1A1 and 282/2). Key Orders: (1) Petitioner has the right to use the government land (S.No. 282/2) for accessing the public pathway to reach his property; (2) Respondents are restrained from obstructing the petitioner's use of the pathway; (3) Respondents must restore the altered pathway structure to its original condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
15-Apr-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
07-Mar-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
31-Jan-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
13-Dec-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
28-Nov-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
07-Nov-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Sep-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Jul-2023
Arguments
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Jun-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
06-Apr-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
06-Feb-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Dec-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
29-Sep-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Aug-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Jul-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Jun-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 52/2022
Court Order Summary Case: I.M. No. 04/2022 | District Court, Madurai | Date: June 18, 2024 Outcome: The petition is allowed without opposition. The court granted both permanent and temporary injunctions in favor of the petitioner against the respondents regarding a land dispute involving a public pathway (S.No. 282/1A1 and 282/2). Key Orders: (1) Petitioner has the right to use the government land (S.No. 282/2) for accessing the public pathway to reach his property; (2) Respondents are restrained from obstructing the petitioner's use of the pathway; (3) Respondents must restore the altered pathway structure to its original condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts